Should Machines Decide Who Lives And Dies In A War? Ex-CIA Chief Answers
Kriti Sanon Says Instagram Has No Option To Report AI-Generated Images Of Her
What Anthropic, Monks And The Cusp Of Consciousness Teach About Tomorrow
Nikhil Kamath's Big AI Bet: Why India Should Look Beyond Silicon Valley
When Will India Get Its Own Apple, Samsung? Ashwini Vaishnaw Reveals Timeline
Neeru Saini On Fitness, Focus & Her Love for Churma!
NDTV Lifeline- Himanshu Saini on the Secret to Eating Well: More Greens, Healthier Desserts
Hockey Champions Savita Punia & Neha Goel on Fitness, Recovery & The Meaning of Health
Millets: The Superfood That's Good for You and the Planet
Yoga, Millets, Vaccines: S Jaishankar On How India Is Building Stronger Ties | NDTV World Summit
Jain, along with counsels Mrinalini Sen Gupta and Prabhsahay Kaur, also placed the samples of different variants they wished to be tested before the court. But the Nestle counsel wanted to know from where they had been, since the product was withdrawn from the market on June 5.
A bench of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, comprising Justice V.K. Jain and Justice B.C. Gupta, said the court will meet again on October 8 to hear the arguments of Nestle India over the fresh tests.
The commission also questioned why Nestle India should have a problem with the testing of their own products, and said, "The government wasn't producing the product". The government's counsel had also filed an application to allow the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) as a party to assist the commission.
During the hearing Nestle India said the company has been singled out and questioned why its competitor brands weren't being tested. Responding to some test reports done by the government, which were missing from the application filed before the court and marked as "Not Applicable", Nestle's counsel said material supporting their company was being concealed and needed to be produced.











